[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Changing how we handle non-free firmware



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 18.08.22 21:58, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> So, I propose the following:
> 
> =================================
> 
> We will include non-free firmware packages from the
> "non-free-firmware" section of the Debian archive on our official
> media (installer images and live images). The included firmware
> binaries will *normally* be enabled by default where the system
> determines that they are required, but where possible we will include
> ways for users to disable this at boot (boot menu option, kernel
> command line etc.).
> 
> When the installer/live system is running we will provide information
> to the user about what firmware has been loaded (both free and
> non-free), and we will also store that information on the target
> system such that users will be able to find it later. The target
> system will *also* be configured to use the non-free-firmware
> component by default in the apt sources.list file. Our users should
> receive security updates and important fixes to firmware binaries just
> like any other installed software.
> 
> We will publish these images as official Debian media, replacing the
> current media sets that do not include non-free firmware packages.
> 
> =================================

Seconded. I'll also second the updated wording suggested by Steve in
<[🔎] 20220819102651.GV2641389@tack.einval.com>

> "Where non-free firmware is found to be necessary, the target system
>  will *also* be configured to use the non-free-firmware component by
>  default in the apt sources.list file."

Kind regards and thanks Steve for finally pushing this through
Philipp Kern
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEPzuChCNsw7gPxr3/RG4lRTXQVuwFAmMAx58ACgkQRG4lRTXQ
VuyYcwf7BNGysJ7UKEaWA56hfKmTJGv7Xi9jB+9zkRTsL/lNF9BQG81wW2TOQMQd
AVewPUXXzHtQBT/z2gEI+0M00dOT1jOYIoryueFKd7V40F4JAUJFaWrNabQPvV6Q
TjkxfYTPuoLbcSXlUtzp4DUJDh3rQj87EhfOdSSOdLcxnAkMCB9+4S4ETS3zjPFH
rCtS4qhFZToZfAyFh4tdWV4FHtQMyjGcJBeO8KmXFUoyJPbRkY7pcuhp/ZS/Ywu+
7nDhJp2T4ePApsrH8pvU4F0d6n8uzawuYMVDdTQeyW+Xjs+ZObqM9yfbvOBrF6Yc
S5xs98XrsDRSptXrLG7DlZh0Ml8IbQ==
=wd4R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: