Re: REPOST, SIGNED: Re: Amendment to RMS/FSF GR: Option 5

To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: REPOST, SIGNED: Re: Amendment to RMS/FSF GR: Option 5
From: Micha Lenk <micha@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2021 13:08:50 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] d1ae3eae-2cf6-a978-028f-bdfef7e3f793@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20210403082513.GA21531@localhost>
References: <[🔎] YGevPUH4SukvmYCE@taz.net.au> <[🔎] YGgaXBROTMm3FmOU@roeckx.be> <[🔎] 20210403082513.GA21531@localhost>

Hi Adrian,

Am 03.04.21 um 10:25 schrieb Adrian Bunk:

Craig, if you make this a new separate GR I will be glad to sponsor it.

Do you (or anybody actually) have a idea how to deal best with the oldRMS GR if this one is formally accepted?


Regards,
Micha

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: REPOST, SIGNED: Re: Amendment to RMS/FSF GR: Option 5
  - From: Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk>
- Re: REPOST, SIGNED: Re: Amendment to RMS/FSF GR: Option 5
  - From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>

References:
- REPOST, SIGNED: Re: Amendment to RMS/FSF GR: Option 5
  - From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: REPOST, SIGNED: Re: Amendment to RMS/FSF GR: Option 5
  - From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
- Re: REPOST, SIGNED: Re: Amendment to RMS/FSF GR: Option 5
  - From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: What does FD Mean
Next by Date: Re: Amendment to RMS/FSF GR: Option 5
Previous by thread: Re: REPOST, SIGNED: Re: Amendment to RMS/FSF GR: Option 5
Next by thread: Re: REPOST, SIGNED: Re: Amendment to RMS/FSF GR: Option 5
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread