Re: "rms-open-letter" GR choice 2: sign https://rms-support-letter.github.io/
Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> writes:
> This is part where the constitution is really hard to parse, and it's
> something I've struggled with for a long time. The terms are used in
> conflicting ways. I hope someone will take the time to fix this.
Yeah, my apologies, I was going to fix this after the systemd GR and then
never did. I've now made a better note of my intention. I think we have
a few procedural GRs we should work through after the DPL election and
this vote.
> In A.1. there is:
> 2. A formal amendment may be accepted by the resolution's proposer, in
> which case the formal resolution draft is immediately changed to
> match.
> 3. If a formal amendment is not accepted, or one of the sponsors of
> the resolution does not agree with the acceptance by the proposer
> of a formal amendment, the amendment remains as an amendment and
> will be voted on.
> It's my current interpretation that no formal amendment was accepted.
This is also consistent (unsurprisingly) with what we did with the systemd
GR, after a lot of discussion of it at the time.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: