On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 12:17:58AM +0530, Sruthi Chandran wrote: > >On 26/03/21 10:45 pm, Sruthi Chandran wrote: > >> >> Dear fellow DDs, >> >> Second the amendment text if acceptable to you :) >> >Re-sending with fixed signature and replacing twitter link with >gnusocial link. > > >> ==== Begin text ==== >> >> Under section 4.1.5 of the constitution, the Developers make the >> following statement: >> >> *Debian’s statement on Richard Stallman rejoining the FSF board* >> >> We at Debian are profoundly disappointed to hear of the re-election of >> Richard Stallman to a leadership position at the Free Software >> Foundation, after a series of serious accusations of misconduct led to >> his resignation as president and board member of the FSF in 2019. >> >> One crucial factor in making our community more inclusive is to >> recognise and reflect when other people are harmed by our >> own actions and consider this feedback in future actions. The way >> Richard Stallman announced his return to the board unfortunately lacks >> any acknowledgement of this kind of thought process. We are deeply >> disappointed that the FSF board elected him a board member again despite >> no discernible steps were taken >> by him to be accountable for, much less make amends for, his past >> actions or those who have been harmed by them. Finally, we are also >> disturbed by the secretive process of his re-election, and how it was >> belately conveyed [0] to FSF’s staff and supporters. >> >> >> We believe this step and how it was communicated sends wrong and hurtful >> message and harms the future of the Free Software movement. The goal of >> the software freedom movement is to empower all people to control >> technology and thereby create a better society for everyone. Free >> Software is meant to serve everyone regardless of their age, ability or >> disability, gender identity, sex, ethnicity, nationality, religion or >> sexual orientation. This requires an inclusive and diverse environment >> that welcomes all contributors equally. Debian realises that we >> ourselves and the Free Software movement still have to work hard to be >> in that place where everyone feels safe and respected to participate in >> it in order to fulfil the movement's mission. >> >> >> That is why, we call for his resignation from all FSF bodies. The FSF >> needs to seriously reflect on this decision as well as their >> decision-making process to prevent similar issues from happening again. >> Therefore, in the current situation we see ourselves unable to >> collaborate both with the FSF and any other organisation in which >> Richard Stallman has a leading position. Instead, we will continue to >> work with groups and individuals who foster diversity and equality in >> the Free Software movement in order to achieve our joint goal of >> empowering all users to control technology. >> >[0] https://status.fsf.org/notice/3796703 >> >> Heavily based on: >> >> [1] https://fsfe.org/news/2021/news-20210324-01.html >> >> [2] >> https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/03/statement-re-election-richard-stallman-fsf-board >> >> ==== End of text ==== Seconded. I may not personally vote this as the #1 option, but it's a good option that I think deserves to be on the ballot. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com Into the distance, a ribbon of black Stretched to the point of no turning back
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature