>>>>> "Dominik" == Dominik George <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes: Dominik> With all due respect to everyone who has been offended by Dominik> Richard Stallman, feels oppressed by him, or is negatively Dominik> affected by his views — every single such person has to be Dominik> heard, their fears and sorrows been taken into account, and Dominik> appropriate action been taken. As such, I am in full Dominik> support of requiring the FSF board to instate an Dominik> investigation committee, take letters from anyone affected, Dominik> and hear these cases (including rms' position). The problem is that for good reason, we no longer trust the FSF under its current governance to do that. What you are affectively asking people to do is to pursue justice in regard to things rms did in a forum where rms has much more power than they do and where rms (and the voting members of the fsf) have demonstrated they will use that power in non equitible ways. Given how rms returned to the board, how can you possibly think those people will get a fair hearing. I think I may disagree with this option even more than the support rms open letter option.
Description: PGP signature