Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter
On 2021/03/24 23:19, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I suspect that the issues surrounding the open letter asking rms to step
> down and for the FSF board to resign are fairly well understood at this
> point.
> It's been an ongoing issue.
>
> I don't think we're going to get much benefit out of a prolonged
> discussion, and I think that there is significant benefit in acting
> quickly in this instance.
> So, I'd like to ask the DPL to consider shortening the discussion
> period.
>
> It's possible that circumstances may arise requiring more
> than a week's discussion.
> But unless that happens I think we would all be happier spending less
> rather than more time on this issue.
> I suspect most people already have their minds made up.
If Steve, as proposer of the GR is comfortable with shortening the
discussion period to one week, then I will use the DPL powers as per
section 4.2.4 of our constitution to enact that.
-Jonathan
Reply to: