[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

DPL blindsides



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512


In a twist, my question goes out to Debian project members, but I'd also
like to hear from the other DPL candidates on this one.

Every year, the DPL candidates post platforms listing what they think
they could do to improve Debian over the next term or so. Often, these
ideas are similar to previous platforms. Sometimes it's because
candidates draw some inspiration from previous platforms, and often its
because those ideas are as relevant and necessary as they were in
previous years.

So, my question to all our project members is, what do you feel is a DPL
blindside? That is, something that's important in Debian that neither
the DPLs or DPL candidates every give (enough) attention to? And is
there anything specific that the next DPL should really pay attention to
that none of the candidates have mentioned yet?

thanks for any answers :)

- -Jonathan

- -- 
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) <jcc>
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  https://wiki.debian.org/highvoltage
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   https://debian.org | https://jonathancarter.org
  ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀  Be Bold. Be brave. Debian has got your back.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=ILkZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: