-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In a twist, my question goes out to Debian project members, but I'd also
like to hear from the other DPL candidates on this one.
Every year, the DPL candidates post platforms listing what they think
they could do to improve Debian over the next term or so. Often, these
ideas are similar to previous platforms. Sometimes it's because
candidates draw some inspiration from previous platforms, and often its
because those ideas are as relevant and necessary as they were in
So, my question to all our project members is, what do you feel is a DPL
blindside? That is, something that's important in Debian that neither
the DPLs or DPL candidates every give (enough) attention to? And is
there anything specific that the next DPL should really pay attention to
that none of the candidates have mentioned yet?
thanks for any answers :)
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) <jcc>
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ https://debian.org | https://jonathancarter.org
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ Be Bold. Be brave. Debian has got your back.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----