[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Results for Init systems and systemd



Greetings,

	This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
 Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary

	This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
 I remain, gentle folks,

    Your humble servant,
    Devotee (on behalf of Debian Project Secretary)

    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Starting results calculation at Sat Dec 28 00:00:29 2019

Option 1 "F: Focus on systemd"
Option 2 "B: Systemd but we support exploring alternatives"
Option 3 "A: Support for multiple init systems is Important"
Option 4 "D: Support non-systemd systems, without blocking progress"
Option 5 "H: Support portability, without blocking progress"
Option 6 "E: Support for multiple init systems is Required"
Option 7 "G: Support portability and multiple implementations"
Option 8 "Further Discussion"

In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.

                  Option
              1     2     3     4     5     6     7     8 
            ===   ===   ===   ===   ===   ===   ===   === 
Option 1          185   246   223   227   278   243   307 
Option 2    207         243   211   216   286   240   299 
Option 3    159   131         113   120   250   165   225 
Option 4    192   177   235         137   309   261   281 
Option 5    187   168   222   163         301   246   271 
Option 6    116   104    88    53    51         121   173 
Option 7    168   145   176    93    91   207         216 
Option 8    110   111   166   114   124   214   168       



Looking at row 2, column 1, B: Systemd but we support exploring alternatives
received 207 votes over F: Focus on systemd

Looking at row 1, column 2, F: Focus on systemd
received 185 votes over B: Systemd but we support exploring alternatives.

Option 1 Reached quorum: 307 > 45.224440295044
Option 2 Reached quorum: 299 > 45.224440295044
Option 3 Reached quorum: 225 > 45.224440295044
Option 4 Reached quorum: 281 > 45.224440295044
Option 5 Reached quorum: 271 > 45.224440295044
Option 6 Reached quorum: 173 > 45.224440295044
Option 7 Reached quorum: 216 > 45.224440295044


Option 1 passes Majority.               2.791 (307/110) >= 1
Option 2 passes Majority.               2.694 (299/111) >= 1
Option 3 passes Majority.               1.355 (225/166) >= 1
Option 4 passes Majority.               2.465 (281/114) >= 1
Option 5 passes Majority.               2.185 (271/124) >= 1
Dropping Option 6 because of Majority. (0.8084112149532710280373831775700934579439)  0.808 (173/214) < 1
Option 7 passes Majority.               1.286 (216/168) >= 1


  Option 2 defeats Option 1 by ( 207 -  185) =   22 votes.
  Option 1 defeats Option 3 by ( 246 -  159) =   87 votes.
  Option 1 defeats Option 4 by ( 223 -  192) =   31 votes.
  Option 1 defeats Option 5 by ( 227 -  187) =   40 votes.
  Option 1 defeats Option 7 by ( 243 -  168) =   75 votes.
  Option 1 defeats Option 8 by ( 307 -  110) =  197 votes.
  Option 2 defeats Option 3 by ( 243 -  131) =  112 votes.
  Option 2 defeats Option 4 by ( 211 -  177) =   34 votes.
  Option 2 defeats Option 5 by ( 216 -  168) =   48 votes.
  Option 2 defeats Option 7 by ( 240 -  145) =   95 votes.
  Option 2 defeats Option 8 by ( 299 -  111) =  188 votes.
  Option 4 defeats Option 3 by ( 235 -  113) =  122 votes.
  Option 5 defeats Option 3 by ( 222 -  120) =  102 votes.
  Option 7 defeats Option 3 by ( 176 -  165) =   11 votes.
  Option 3 defeats Option 8 by ( 225 -  166) =   59 votes.
  Option 5 defeats Option 4 by ( 163 -  137) =   26 votes.
  Option 4 defeats Option 7 by ( 261 -   93) =  168 votes.
  Option 4 defeats Option 8 by ( 281 -  114) =  167 votes.
  Option 5 defeats Option 7 by ( 246 -   91) =  155 votes.
  Option 5 defeats Option 8 by ( 271 -  124) =  147 votes.
  Option 7 defeats Option 8 by ( 216 -  168) =   48 votes.


The Schwartz Set contains:
	 Option 2 "B: Systemd but we support exploring alternatives"



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

The winners are:
	 Option 2 "B: Systemd but we support exploring alternatives"

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

-- 
The voters have spoken, the bastards... --unknown
DEbian VOTe EnginE
digraph Results {
  ranksep=0.25;
 "F: Focus on systemd\n2.79" [ style="filled" , fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10  ];
 "F: Focus on systemd\n2.79" -> "A: Support for multiple init systems is Important\n1.36" [ label="87" ];
 "F: Focus on systemd\n2.79" -> "D: Support non-systemd systems, without blocking progress\n2.46" [ label="31" ];
 "F: Focus on systemd\n2.79" -> "H: Support portability, without blocking progress\n2.19" [ label="40" ];
 "F: Focus on systemd\n2.79" -> "G: Support portability and multiple implementations\n1.29" [ label="75" ];
 "F: Focus on systemd\n2.79" -> "Further Discussion" [ label="197" ];
 "B: Systemd but we support exploring alternatives\n2.69" [ style="filled" , color="powderblue", shape=egg, fontcolor="NavyBlue", fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10  ];
 "B: Systemd but we support exploring alternatives\n2.69" -> "F: Focus on systemd\n2.79" [ label="22" ];
 "B: Systemd but we support exploring alternatives\n2.69" -> "A: Support for multiple init systems is Important\n1.36" [ label="112" ];
 "B: Systemd but we support exploring alternatives\n2.69" -> "D: Support non-systemd systems, without blocking progress\n2.46" [ label="34" ];
 "B: Systemd but we support exploring alternatives\n2.69" -> "H: Support portability, without blocking progress\n2.19" [ label="48" ];
 "B: Systemd but we support exploring alternatives\n2.69" -> "G: Support portability and multiple implementations\n1.29" [ label="95" ];
 "B: Systemd but we support exploring alternatives\n2.69" -> "Further Discussion" [ label="188" ];
 "A: Support for multiple init systems is Important\n1.36" [ style="filled" , fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10  ];
 "A: Support for multiple init systems is Important\n1.36" -> "Further Discussion" [ label="59" ];
 "D: Support non-systemd systems, without blocking progress\n2.46" [ style="filled" , fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10  ];
 "D: Support non-systemd systems, without blocking progress\n2.46" -> "A: Support for multiple init systems is Important\n1.36" [ label="122" ];
 "D: Support non-systemd systems, without blocking progress\n2.46" -> "G: Support portability and multiple implementations\n1.29" [ label="168" ];
 "D: Support non-systemd systems, without blocking progress\n2.46" -> "Further Discussion" [ label="167" ];
 "H: Support portability, without blocking progress\n2.19" [ style="filled" , fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10  ];
 "H: Support portability, without blocking progress\n2.19" -> "A: Support for multiple init systems is Important\n1.36" [ label="102" ];
 "H: Support portability, without blocking progress\n2.19" -> "D: Support non-systemd systems, without blocking progress\n2.46" [ label="26" ];
 "H: Support portability, without blocking progress\n2.19" -> "G: Support portability and multiple implementations\n1.29" [ label="155" ];
 "H: Support portability, without blocking progress\n2.19" -> "Further Discussion" [ label="147" ];
 "E: Support for multiple init systems is Required\n0.81" [ style="filled" , color="pink", shape=octagon, fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10  ];
 "Further Discussion" -> "E: Support for multiple init systems is Required\n0.81" [ label="41" ];
 "G: Support portability and multiple implementations\n1.29" [ style="filled" , fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10  ];
 "G: Support portability and multiple implementations\n1.29" -> "A: Support for multiple init systems is Important\n1.36" [ label="11" ];
 "G: Support portability and multiple implementations\n1.29" -> "Further Discussion" [ label="48" ];
 "Further Discussion" [ style="filled" , shape=diamond, fontcolor="Red", fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10  ];
}

Attachment: pgpdDUVLfpPx7.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: