On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 10:23:29AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > On 15358 March 1977, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > Statement: every Debian package must be maintained in Git on salsa and > > every Debian Developer with upload rights to the archive should have > > commit/push right to every packaging repository on salsa. > > Well, you took it from one of my mails, so it is mostly what I said, so > yeah. Concepts like LowThresholdNMU are nice, but the wrong way around. The big difference is the "must": I'm suggesting that no package should be in the archive if it isn't Git-maintained on salsa in a repo writable by all DDs. So, let me insist: do you agree with that (specific version of the) statement or not? > I think the DPL can (try to) start and steer discussions the right way. > In the end something that drastic will need a project decision on it, > either by everyone just doing it (highly unlikely given our project) or > a GR. I'm sorry, but there are so many hypothethicals here that I still have no idea of what you, as a DPL, will do to make us closer to the net goal. Will you start a discussion on this or not? Will you start a GR on this or not? Cheers -- Stefano Zacchiroli . zack@upsilon.cc . upsilon.cc/zack . . o . . . o . o Computer Science Professor . CTO Software Heritage . . . . . o . . . o o Former Debian Project Leader & OSI Board Director . . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature