Hi Alex, Alexander Wirt: >> While I agree that some "more modern" going way would be nice for lists, >> I don't think that is an easy task. Nor one where DPL can do much >> (unless listmasters need some resources that DPL can approve for such a >> change). Its up to the listmasters, though as far as i know, our current >> setup is anything but easily converted. >> In my experience as a former mailman admin and listadmin mailman is a no-go. > Getting our feature set even nearly into mailman is impossible, takes years > and will just get us an unmaintainable thing. I don't want to ever run a > bigger mailman setup again. Can you give an example, what from "our feature set" is missing in mailman? Also, you probably mean mailman2, right? Have you taken a look at mailman3 recently? Cheers, jonas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature