>>>>> "Jose" == Jose Miguel Parrella <bureado@debian.org> writes:
Jose> If DPL Team/Committee worked, and delegations start to feel
Jose> more permanent (delegated functions make sense, terms are
Jose> long) then why wouldn't a few of those delegates become Debian
Jose> Leadership Team members alongside DPL, tech-ctte chair and
Jose> Secretary? Why wouldn't the "Debian Spokesperson" role, a
Jose> formal one that could get invited by any event organizer like
Jose> a DPL would, be a Constitution-regulated one?
I would be against this change. The current system gives the DPL a lot
of flexibility. Today you're seeing that different candidates would
focus on different things and organize the people who helped them
differently.
Sticking these roles into the constitution removes that flexibility with
very little gain.
I think flexibility is valuable.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature