Re: GR proposal: give up on declassifying debian-private (Re: General Resolution: Declassifying debian-private results)
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:37:06PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Jakub Wilk writes ("Re: GR proposal: give up on declassifying debian-private (Re: General Resolution: Declassifying debian-private results)"):
> > * Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>, 2016-09-20, 16:47:
> > >5. Participants are reminded to use -private only when necessary.
> >
> > s/5/6/
>
> Indeed. Kurt, could you please note this numbering fix (to "correct a
> minor error" under A.1.6) ? That is, the 2nd of the two paragraphs
> numbered 5 shoudl be numbered 6.
s/shoudl/should/ ? :)
So I fixed this by accident, and I think that clearly falls under
that.
Kurt
Reply to: