[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Iain Lane's proposal

also sprach Steve M. Robbins <steve@sumost.ca> [2016-09-22 04:17 +0200]:
> I second the proposal made in https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2016/09/
> msg00092.html and quoted below.

+1 from me.

> ========================================================================
> Title: debian-private shall remain private
> The text of the GR is replaced with the following.
>   1. The 2005 General Resolution titled "Declassification of
>      debian-private list archives" is repealed.
>   2. There shall be no declassification of any portion of the
>      debian-private archives, except in the following circumstances.
>      2a. Participants may declassify their own material.
>      2b. Participants may declassify the material of others where
>          consent has explicitly been given by the authors of all of the
>          material being declassified.
>   3. Participants are reminded to use -private only when necessary.
> ========================================================================

 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> @martinkrafft
: :'  :  proud Debian developer
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
"it would be truly surprising
 if sound were not capable of suggesting colour,
 if colours could not give the idea of the melody,
 if sound and colour were not adequate to express ideas."
                                                   -- claude debussy

Attachment: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital GPG signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)

Reply to: