Re: GR proposal: give up on declassifying debian-private (Re: General Resolution: Declassifying debian-private results)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I hereby support this proposal as an additional option on the ballot
(but not as a replacement).
Le 21/09/2016 à 14:53, Ian Jackson a écrit :
> I think it would be best to seek further sponsors for my proposal.
> If you like my version, or would like to see it on the ballot,
> please second it.
> Here it is:
>> Formal proposal for amendment to Gunnar's GR: delete all, and
>> replace with:
>> Title: Acknowledge difficulty of declassifying debian-private
>> 1. The Debian Project regrets the non-implementation of the 2005
>> General Resolution titled "Declassification of debian-private
>> list archives". That General Resolution is hereby repealed.
>> 2. In case volunteers should come forward: Permission remains for
>> the list archives (of any messages, whether posted before or
>> after this resolution) to be declassified, provided that the
>> declassification process is at least as respecting of the
>> privacy of posters to debian-private as the process set out in
>> the 2005 General Resolution.
>> 3. Furthermore, the Debian listmasters remain empowered (subject
>> to the usual consultation processes within the Debian project)
>> to revise the rules governing the privacy and declassification
>> of messages to -private. This includes making measures to make
>> declassification more widely applicable, or easier to automate.
>> 4. But, any weakening of the privacy expectations must not be
>> retrospective: changes should apply only to messages posted
>> after the rule change has come into force.
>> 5. In particular, we reaffirm this rule: no part of a posting
>> made to -private, which explicitly states that it should not be
>> declassified, may be published (without its author's explicit
>> consent). This rule may be changed by the listmasters (para.3,
>> above), but only for future messages (para.4, above), and only
>> following consultation, and only with ample notice.
>> 5. Participants are reminded to use -private only when
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1
>> =/vLH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Thanks, Ian.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----