Re: GR proposal: give up on declassifying debian-private (Re: General Resolution: Declassifying debian-private results)
Gunnar Wolf writes ("Re: GR proposal: give up on declassifying debian-private (Re: General Resolution: Declassifying debian-private results)"):
> Ian Jackson dijo [Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 03:43:43PM +0100]:
> > Do I need to re-make my proposal as an amendment to Gunnar's or are
> > you happy to treat it as such ?
> FWIW I think we will be better off if we have it as a distinct option
> (as it is semantically quite different).
Sorry, yes, that's what I mean. But formally there is one GR with a
number of different options, each of which is a technically an
amendment. (The process has this so that there is a defined person
who decides when to call a vote - in this case, you.)
But right now if my proposal gets enough seconds, technically there
might be two separate GRs, which would be silly.
Ian Jackson <email@example.com> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.