[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposed GR: Acknowledge difficulty of declassifying debian-private

I second Ian's proposal, *without* withdrawing my own.

Ian Jackson dijo [Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 05:27:42PM +0100]:
> Hash: SHA256
> I have changed my about waiting before making a formal proposal.
> I hereby propose the following General Resolution.
>  Title: Acknowledge difficulty of declassifying debian-private
>  1. The Debian Project regrets the non-implementation of the 2005
>     General Resolution titled "Declassification of debian-private list
>     archives".  That General Resolution is hereby repealed.
>  2. In case volunteers should come forward: Permission remains for the
>     list archives (of any messages, whether posted before or after
>     this resolution) to be declassified, provided that the
>     declassification process is at least as respecting of the privacy
>     of posters to debian-private as the process set out in the 2005
>     General Resolution.
>  3. Furthermore, the Debian listmasters remain empowered (subject to
>     the usual consultation processes within the Debian project) to
>     revise the rules governing the privacy and declassification of
>     messages to -private.  This includes making measures to make
>     declassification more widely applicable, or easier to automate.
>  4. But, any weakening of the privacy expectations must not be
>     retrospective: changes should apply only to messages posted after
>     the rule change has come into force.
>  5. In particular, we reaffirm this rule: no part of a posting made to
>     -private, which explicitly states that it should not be
>     declassified, may be published (without its author's explicit
>     consent).  This rule may be changed by the listmasters (para.3,
>     above), but only for future messages (para.4, above), and only
>     following consultation, and only with ample notice.
>  5. Participants are reminded to use -private only when necessary.
> Thanks,
> Ian.
> Version: GnuPG v1
> 0antkQCFmL6QFDlyez29cLBpz/2oXU1DQIh0/jlKjv1hgq/oyZMtBZg7C8nrXJ5c
> A953duOPhpqlNuq/xr9EF3R/8o15IdTaB1YUxStuGcgXVMl1bKOiI6QCam9RHGLK
> mtHmcWL/7/lOEm8gNDNW6T6lvCTC2Q/76oQtckeWzQIqhvdkN3pw4nUFSLQmTD3k
> ffgTh3xUkeSbviYUbw2vU/NU92+MNN4gV2hD8olAjJIiB/kvN152QIlh4z7zJ08g
> =Wwku

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: