[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Proposed GR: Acknowledge difficulty of declassifying debian-private



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

I have changed my about waiting before making a formal proposal.

I hereby propose the following General Resolution.

 Title: Acknowledge difficulty of declassifying debian-private

 1. The Debian Project regrets the non-implementation of the 2005
    General Resolution titled "Declassification of debian-private list
    archives".  That General Resolution is hereby repealed.

 2. In case volunteers should come forward: Permission remains for the
    list archives (of any messages, whether posted before or after
    this resolution) to be declassified, provided that the
    declassification process is at least as respecting of the privacy
    of posters to debian-private as the process set out in the 2005
    General Resolution.

 3. Furthermore, the Debian listmasters remain empowered (subject to
    the usual consultation processes within the Debian project) to
    revise the rules governing the privacy and declassification of
    messages to -private.  This includes making measures to make
    declassification more widely applicable, or easier to automate.

 4. But, any weakening of the privacy expectations must not be
    retrospective: changes should apply only to messages posted after
    the rule change has come into force.

 5. In particular, we reaffirm this rule: no part of a posting made to
    -private, which explicitly states that it should not be
    declassified, may be published (without its author's explicit
    consent).  This rule may be changed by the listmasters (para.3,
    above), but only for future messages (para.4, above), and only
    following consultation, and only with ample notice.

 5. Participants are reminded to use -private only when necessary.

Thanks,
Ian.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX0uJcAAoJEOPjOSNItQ05MTIIAJ+Vu0oAqM7qau1NnFn+x+OO
0antkQCFmL6QFDlyez29cLBpz/2oXU1DQIh0/jlKjv1hgq/oyZMtBZg7C8nrXJ5c
A953duOPhpqlNuq/xr9EF3R/8o15IdTaB1YUxStuGcgXVMl1bKOiI6QCam9RHGLK
mtHmcWL/7/lOEm8gNDNW6T6lvCTC2Q/76oQtckeWzQIqhvdkN3pw4nUFSLQmTD3k
ffgTh3xUkeSbviYUbw2vU/NU92+MNN4gV2hD8olAjJIiB/kvN152QIlh4z7zJ08g
RJqtJSLGCc8Qidi27T+QSCRApt42+JUWjP+UjPS6GflSSBIMzRzoEvN7kEAQfWk=
=Wwku
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>   These opinions are my own.

If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.


Reply to: