Re: General resolution: Changes to the Standard Resolution Procedure
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le lundi, 31 août 2015, 11.04:59 Axel Beckert a écrit :
> > I would have preferred if "off-by-one" would have been used instead of
> > "fencepost" as in the subject of the original GR proposal. That term
> > is later missing in the announcement by Kurt as well as on
> > https://www.debian.org/vote/2015/vote_002
> > "off-by-one" is very common, self-descriptive and well-known even
> > among non-native speakers. "fencepost" is not. (…)
> > > or would you like to propose a GR amendment?
> > As far as I understand this would mean proposing an alternative choice
> > for the voter. In that case, the damage is already done and cannot be
> > undone. This IMHO only makes sense if I'd propose different
> > semantics.
> The GR proposer can accept formal wording changes directly on his
> amendment proposal (§A.1.5).
Ah, I wasn't aware of this.
> I think the change would clarify the GR for more voters than only you,
> so I'm hereby asking Andreas whether he'd accept a wording change on his
> GR proposal as follows (%s/fencepost/off-by-one/g), under §A.1.5:
Thanks! Much appreciated!
,''`. | Axel Beckert <email@example.com>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE