On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 09:13:10AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 20/03/15 at 20:02 +0000, Neil McGovern wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 08:56:23PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > > > also sprach Neil McGovern <neilm@debian.org> [2015-03-20 19:27 +0100]: > > > > I'd be more sympathetic to funding someone (perhaps via an > > > > internship, or gap year student who's going on to accountancy) to > > > > help set up a system so we can track it easier, but only if we > > > > woudn't be wasting their time with them simply pinging TOs for > > > > data, and not getting replies. > > > > > > Let's assume they'd be wasting time pinging TOs for data and not > > > getting replies. What would you do in that case? > > > > > > > If a TO can't give us useful data about income and expenditure in a > > timely manner, that's not acceptible. We should drop the TO unless > > improvements happen. > > As it has been mentioned before, SPI has been struggling with that for a > long time now (since before my terms). > They seem to be mostly caught up at the moment, or perhaps there's some other information you're seeking that has not been forthcoming? > Does the above mean that, if elected, you will drop SPI from our TO? > Which other TO would you then use to keep our funds in dollars? What > about non-monetary assets? I think you've unintentionally set up a straw man here. However, answering in general, there's a number of organisations around the US who are able to offer similar services should an evaluation be required[0]. Neil [0] http://flossfoundations.org/foundation-directory --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature