[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GR proposal, Call for Seconds - term limit for the tech-ctte



Hi, 

On Mon Dec 01, 2014 at 12:20:25 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> [ Cross post -vote, -project ; M-F-T: to -vote.
> 
>   For more background information on the development of this proposal,
>   see https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2014/11/msg00274.html ]
> 
> I'm hereby formally submitting the GR proposal included below between
> dashed double lines, and calling for seconds.  With respect to past
> discussions on the -vote mailing list, this is the proposal code-named
> "2-S"; see [1,2] for (the last known versions of) alternative proposals.
> 
> [1]: https://people.debian.org/~zack/gr-ctte-term-limit/
> [2]: http://git.upsilon.cc/?p=text/gr-ctte-term-limit.git;a=tree
> 
> ===========================================================================
> The Constitution is amended as follows:
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --- constitution.txt.orig	2014-11-17 18:02:53.314945907 +0100
> +++ constitution.2-S.txt	2014-11-21 16:56:47.328071287 +0100
> @@ -299,8 +299,20 @@
>         Project Leader may appoint new member(s) until the number of
>         members reaches 6, at intervals of at least one week per
>         appointment.
> -    5. If the Technical Committee and the Project Leader agree they may
> +    5. A Developer is not eligible to be (re)appointed to the Technical
> +       Committee if they have been a member within the previous 12 months.
> +    6. If the Technical Committee and the Project Leader agree they may
>         remove or replace an existing member of the Technical Committee.
> +    7. Term limit:
> +         1. On January 1st of each year the term of any Committee member
> +            who has served more than 42 months (3.5 years) and who is one
> +            of the two most senior members is set to expire on December
> +            31st of that year.
> +         2. A member of the Technical Committee is said to be more senior
> +            than another if they were appointed earlier, or were appointed
> +            at the same time and have been a member of the Debian Project
> +            longer. In the event that a member has been appointed more
> +            than once, only the most recent appointment is relevant.
>  
>    6.3. Procedure
>  
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 

Seconded.

-- 
 Martin Zobel-Helas <zobel@debian.org>    Debian System Administrator
 Debian & GNU/Linux Developer                       Debian Listmaster
 http://about.me/zobel                               Debian Webmaster
 GPG Fingerprint:  6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D  BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: