On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 09:51:44AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:33:10AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > 2. A member of the Technical Committee is said to be more senior > > than another if they were appointed earlier, or were appointed > > at the same time and have been a member of the Debian Project > > longer. In the event that a member has been appointed more > > than once, only the most recent appointment is relevant. > > I think it makes more sense to have someone who was previously a > member of the TC have more seniority, before "age" within the project: > > A member of the Technical Committee is said to be more senior than > another if they were appointed earlier. In the case where two members > of the Committee were appointed at the same time, then total time > served on the Committee (including previous appointments in the event > of a member being appointed more than once) and membership time in the > Debian Project as a whole will be considered, in that order. Considering the likelihood of a situation in which the two alternative approach lead to different results, is it worth an increase from 60 words to 77 (including a parenthetical)? -- Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . zack@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o Former Debian Project Leader . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature