On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:41:28PM +0000, Sam Hartman wrote: > Hmm, are you saying that I should dislike option 4 too because if we > had three resignations in the middle of next year we could get into > the same situation unless some of the resignations were from the > senior members? I actually do find that reason compelling as an > argument of 2-r over 2-s. All I wanted to do is to bring your attention the fact that a pending change to 2 would make it behave exactly like 2-S (for the purpose of your mail at least), because you seemed to have not taken that into account. Nothing more, nothing less :) -- Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . zack@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o Former Debian Project Leader . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature