Re: [DRAFT] Maximum term for tech ctte members
>>>>> "Stefano" == Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> writes:
[quoting out of order]
>> I also believe that we should not treat the current situation as
>> exceptional. This will not be the last time we have a tough
>> issue before us that takes up a lot of emotional energy. It is
>> strongly in the interest of TC members and the project for us to
>> encourage people to find something that makes them happy when the
>> TC no longer does. So, I recommend evaluating these mechanisms
>> against future similar situations as an important evaluation
>> criteria.
Stefano> Agreed.
Stefano> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:12:13PM +0000, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> For myself I do not like the effects of option 1.
[only 3 people on the TC]
Stefano> Note that it has been proposed to amend option (1) to
Stefano> remove the transitional measure. I have yet to see
Stefano> objections to that proposal.
Stefano> With that change applied, and limited to the effects you
Stefano> discussed in your mail, proposal (1) will behave exactly
Stefano> like (4).
That's exactly the sort of thinking I was hoping to avoid when I said
we need to avoid treating the current situation as exceptional.
I dislike any option that would produce bad results if applied in the
middle of the current situation. Why? I think the current situation
could happen again at any time.
Hmm, are you saying that I should dislike option 4 too because if we had
three resignations in the middle of next year we could get into the same
situation unless some of the resignations were from the senior members?
I actually do find that reason compelling as an argument of 2-r over
2-s.
--Sam
Reply to: