On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:12:13PM +0000, Sam Hartman wrote: > 1) 2 would expire two people at Jan 1, 2015, meaning the TC had only 3 > experienced folks on it. [...] > 4) Anthony's new proposal would schedule the two most senior folks to > expire at end of 2015, right? So you'd have up to 5 experienced folks > through most of 2015. > > For myself I do not like the effects of option 1. Note that it has been proposed to amend option (1) to remove the transitional measure. I have yet to see objections to that proposal. With that change applied, and limited to the effects you discussed in your mail, proposal (1) will behave exactly like (4). > I also believe that we should not treat the current situation as > exceptional. This will not be the last time we have a tough issue > before us that takes up a lot of emotional energy. It is strongly in > the interest of TC members and the project for us to encourage people > to find something that makes them happy when the TC no longer does. > So, I recommend evaluating these mechanisms against future similar > situations as an important evaluation criteria. Agreed. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . zack@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o Former Debian Project Leader . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature