Re: [DRAFT] Maximum term for tech ctte members
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 21:17:11 +0000, Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au> said:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 07:51:16PM +0000, Philip Hands wrote:
>> Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> writes: > - only resignations from
>> people who would have been expired count in S FWIW I think either of
>> those deals with the concerns I raised, as it's going to be way too
>> much effort to game that, and I cannot see why anyone would want to
>> bother to do so.
> I think:
> On Jan 1st of each year the term of any Committee member who has
> served more than 42 months (3.5 years) and who is one of the two most
> senior members is set to expire on Dec 31st of that year.
> would work as a description of that approach. Seems like a pretty good
> compromise between '2' and '2-R'.
> Also, it makes the arbitrarily chosen constant 42, which is always a
> good thing.
Yes, due to the use of the constant 42, this wording is clearly
preferable to the wording I proposed in another email. (I think it's a
clearer wording too.)
--
Hubert Chathi <uhoreg@debian.org> -- Jabber: hubert@uhoreg.ca
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
Reply to: