Re: [DRAFT] Maximum term for tech ctte members

[Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>]

On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:55:28AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> That said, I now am convinced that "2" (without "salvaging" by expiries
> of non-senior members) is a better model than "2-R". I've pondered your
> arguments below, but I don't find them convincing.  Specifically,

Note that with Ian, Russ and Colin's resignation announcements we have a
test case of the difference between these two options:

 "2": Russ, Ian resign, either (Bdale, Steve expire; Colin resigns) or
      (Colin resigns; Bdale, Steve expire) leaving just Andi, Don and
      Keith on the committee, with five spots to fill come January,
      and Andi and Don due to expire Jan 1st 2016.

or

 "2-R": Russ, Ian, Colin resign; nobody expires; Bdale, Steve, Andi, Don,
      Keith remain on the committee, with three spots to fill come
      January, and Bdale and Steve due to expire Jan 1st 2016.

Cheers,
aj