Re: increasing maximum ctte size
Le mercredi, 19 novembre 2014, 00.12:27 Neil McGovern a écrit :
> > Even if it were as ready, I wonder if it wouldn't be better to have
> > a
> > separate GR. Voting once instead of twice is nice for everyone, but
> > conflating two separate decisions in a single GR has been proven to
> > be unwise in the past. And I'm especially wary of doing so with a
> > constitutional change. Secretary: can you share your thoughts on
> > this last point with us, what would be best from the ballot
> > preparation POV?
> If you think you want this as a separate option, I would suggest an
> amendment to your original text and not accepting it. This way people
> could (with condorcet) choose between the two.
That doesn't work if people want to vote on change A and change B
independently, unless the ballot becomes:
* only A
* only B
* B & A
… at which point two votes in sequence make more sense, IMHO.
OdyX
Reply to: