On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 01:30:18PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Tue, 04 Nov 2014, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > On 04/11/14 at 17:53 +0000, Neil McGovern wrote: > > > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > > > 57dd4d7c-3e92-428f-8ab7-10de5172589e > > > [ ] Choice 1: Packages may not (in general) require a specific init system > > > [ ] Choice 2: Support alternative init systems as much as possible > > > [ ] Choice 3: Packages may require specific init systems if maintainers decide > > > [ ] Choice 4: General Resolution is not required > > > [ ] Choice 5: Further Discussion > > > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > > Why not just make Choice 2: > > Packages should support sysvinit for jessie. > > Otherwise, if you all aren't able to agree, just: > Long story short, we've come to an agreement on: Support for other init systems is recommended, but not mandatory I'll send out a new CfV once voting opens. Neil
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature