Re: Call for Votes: General Resolution: Init system coupling
On 4 November 2014 21:30, Don Armstrong <don@debian.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Nov 2014, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> On 04/11/14 at 17:53 +0000, Neil McGovern wrote:
>> > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>> > 57dd4d7c-3e92-428f-8ab7-10de5172589e
>> > [ ] Choice 1: Packages may not (in general) require a specific init system
>> > [ ] Choice 2: Support alternative init systems as much as possible
>> > [ ] Choice 3: Packages may require specific init systems if maintainers decide
>> > [ ] Choice 4: General Resolution is not required
>> > [ ] Choice 5: Further Discussion
>> > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
> Why not just make Choice 2:
>
> Packages should support sysvinit for jessie.
>
> Otherwise, if you all aren't able to agree, just:
>
> Choice 1: Proposal
> Choice 2: Amendment A
> Choice 3: Amendment B
> Choice 4: Amendment C
> Choice 5: Further Discussion
>
> and we can get on with the voting.
>
+1, I was also expecting the ballot to be like this, which indeed
would force people to read the full texts of the vote, as I do not
think the summaries are fair (they are either under or over stating
the actual choice text)
--
Regards,
Dimitri.
Reply to: