Re: Call for Votes: General Resolution: Init system coupling

[Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>]

Lucas Nussbaum writes ("Re: Call for Votes: General Resolution: Init system coupling"):
> Second, after asking for an accurate summary, I replied in
> <20141017202805.GA10561@xanadu.blop.info> (private mail to you+Ian, as
> was your initial query) with: "support for alternative init systems is
> desirable but not mandatory". If you disagreed with the suggestion, why
> didn't you say so since Oct 17th?

I concur with Lucas's comments.

> If my suggestion is too long, you could have used any of the following,
> which are all shorter or the same size as the summary for Choice 3:
> - Support for alternative init systems is desirable, not mandatory
> - Maintainers are encouraged to support alternative init systems
> 
> I think that it would be better to update the CfV.

I agree.

I think this is still possible.  It's a shame that this slightly odd
pre-CFV (CFV posted before voting period opens) wasn't explicitly a
draft, and posted only to -vote.

Sorry,
Ian.