On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 09:52:39PM +0000, Sam Hartman wrote: > >>>>> "Sune" == Sune Vuorela <nospam@vuorela.dk> writes: > > > Sune> I read the logs from the tech-ctte meeting, and my impression > Sune> was that - people in tech-ctte thinks that maximum terms are a > Sune> good idea - that they should push the thing forward (if no one > Sune> else does) - but they should wait with doing it until the > Sune> current GR is over > > nod. My concern is one of process, not any strong disagreement with > opinions expressed. > Neil's message (and note he's also not a TC member) represented things > as a decision having been made in that TC meeting. Indeed, apologies, I was spending about 4 hours last night setting up the current vote. The intention was to try and re-assure that it's not been forgotton about! > Personally, I agree that having multiple active discussion/second > periods on debian-vote is problematic. For myself, I think midway > through the voting period of the current GR will clear up this list > enough that starting to collect seconds on a new GR seems fine, but I'm > happy to delay beyond that if a significant number of people think > that's valuable. I'd personally prefer it happening after this vote is concluded, but will endevour to set up a GR if that's what happens. Neil --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature