Re: Maximum term for tech ctte members
>>>>> "Don" == Don Armstrong <don@debian.org> writes:
>> Personally, I agree that having multiple active discussion/second
>> periods on debian-vote is problematic.
Don> Right; that's what we seemed to agree on as well.
Don> I think that we can all agree that we'd like a decision on this
Don> amendment significantly before January 1st, which presumably
Don> means having it formally proposed well before December 3rd.
OK. So there is some time pressure.
I personally don't see any problem with that going on while the CFV for
the previous resolution is in place.
So, I think my comment about acting in a week or so seems about right.
I'd find arguments of the form "I personally would find it confusing/bad
to have both going on because ..." more compelling than arguments of
the form "it would generally be confusing/bad." What I'm saying is that
I'd be a lot more sympathetic to delay more than a week or so if people
come forward and say they personally would like to delay more than if
they say that some nebulous we/it would be a good idea to delay more.
--Sam
Reply to: