Re: Calling for the vote (Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems)
On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 10:59:24PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: Calling for the vote (Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems)"):
> > On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 02:34:45PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > That was at `Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 14:59:16 +0100'.
> > > $ date -d 'Sun, 19 Oct 2014 14:59:16 +0100 +14 days'
> > > Sun Nov 2 13:59:16 GMT 2014
> > > $
> > As far as I know, amendment C was at least 1 day later,
> > according to the vote page, but I haven't been keeping track of
> > things.
> I did not accept amendment C. Therefore it does not reset the clock.
Ian's interpretation seems correct and straightforward to me.
(Every so often I do think the secretary's role in managing votes should
be replaced by a moderately large shell script, so decisions like these
are a matter of coded constraints rather than ad hoc interpretation...)
Cheers,
aj
Reply to: