Re: Amendment: Enhance requirements for General resolutions
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> and here is the promised amendment which will require a maximum of
> floor(Q) developers to second a GR.
>
> PROPOSAL START
> ========================================================================
> General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
> Project. Yet, in a project the size of Debian, the current requirements
> to initiate one are too small.
>
> Therefore the Debian project resolves that
> a) The constitution gets changed to not require K developers to sponsor
> a resolution, but floor(Q). [see §4.2(1)]
> b) Delaying a decision of a Delegate or the DPL [§4.2(2.2)],
> as well as resolutions against a shortening of discussion/voting
> period or to overwrite a TC decision [§4.2(2.3)] requires floor(Q)
> developers to sponsor the resolution.
> c) the definition of K gets erased from the constitution. [§4.2(7)]
>
> (Numbers in brackets are references to sections in the constitution).
> ========================================================================
> PROPOSAL END
I second this proposal.
Colin
- --
Colin Tuckley | +44(0)1223 400536 | PGP/GnuPG Key Id
Debian Developer | +44(0)7799 143369 | 0x1B3045CE
"Waiter, there's no fly in my soup!" -- Kermit the frog
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAknJFpUACgkQj2OPlhswRc5TswCfd0IRAGLfg2+eChX4FBF06X2D
rqkAn1OGPrcY3Bey/7+dBYGB9wJg4OuV
=ZowI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: