[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal: Enhance requirements for General resolutions



Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org> writes:

> PROPOSAL START
> ========================================================================
> General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
> Project. Yet, in a project the size of Debian, the current requirements
> to initiate one are too small.
>
> Therefore the Debian project resolves that
>  a) The constitution gets changed to not require K developers to sponsor
>     a resolution, but floor(2Q). [see §4.2(1)]
>  b) Delaying a decision of a Delegate or the DPL [§4.2(2.2)],
>     as well as resolutions against a shortening of discussion/voting
>     period or to overwrite a TC decision [§4.2(2.3)] requires floor(Q)
>     developers to sponsor the resolution.
>  c) the definition of K gets erased from the constitution. [§4.2(7)]
>
> (Numbers in brackets are references to sections in the constitution).
> ========================================================================
> PROPOSAL END

I agree that I would like to see a diff, ideally, but regardless,
seconded.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org)               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

Attachment: pgpJP30wp5zK6.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: