Re: Results of the Lenny release GR
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 09:14:27PM +0000, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Mon Jan 12 22:07, Robert Millan wrote:
> > I find this reasonable, in general, for minor issues. But it's worth noting
> > that in this occasion, the developers didn't feel it was necessary to delegate
> > this responsibility. If they did, they'd have voted for option 4.
> They did vote for option 4, through the wonders of condorcet. more than
> half the voters were happy with that option (or it would not have beaten
For a very specific and convenient definition of "happy". According to your
definition, the developers endorsed both delegating and not delegating at
the same time!
I guess now you'll have a hard time explaining me what this means...
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."