[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Discussion: Possible GR: Enhance requirements for General Resolutions

On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 09:17:28AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:

> (Don has, after subsequent argument, modified this to “… that
> you don't plan on ranking above Further Discussion”.)

Bad, bad idea!  What if you are planning to rank "Further Discussion"
as 1, but staill have a compromise you'd be willing to accept that you
think is _far_ better than anything _else_ that's been proposed?

I think the best solution is simply to say, "don't propose (or second)
something you're not willing to live with."

Chris Waters           |  Pneumonoultra-        osis is too long
xtifr@debian.org       |  microscopicsilico-    to fit into a single
or xtifr@speakeasy.net |  volcaniconi-          standalone haiku

Reply to: