Re: Discussion: Possible GR: Enhance requirements for General Resolutions
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 09:17:28AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> (Don has, after subsequent argument, modified this to “… that
> you don't plan on ranking above Further Discussion”.)
Bad, bad idea! What if you are planning to rank "Further Discussion"
as 1, but staill have a compromise you'd be willing to accept that you
think is _far_ better than anything _else_ that's been proposed?
I think the best solution is simply to say, "don't propose (or second)
something you're not willing to live with."
Chris Waters | Pneumonoultra- osis is too long
email@example.com | microscopicsilico- to fit into a single
or firstname.lastname@example.org | volcaniconi- standalone haiku