[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposed wording for the SC modification

Le lundi 17 novembre 2008 à 13:26 -0600, Ean Schuessler a écrit :
> > No, the proposal wouldn’t allow that since it only lifts DFSG #2. Such
> > an image would still fail DFSG #1, #3, #7, and probably #5 and #6.
> No, it would not. The image is "firmware" and is not subject to DFSG requirements.

Have you actually read Peter’s proposal?

: :' :      We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `'       We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
  `-        our own. Resistance is futile.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

Reply to: