This one time, at band camp, Adeodato Simó said: > * Manoj Srivastava [Sat, 15 Nov 2008 17:38:56 -0600]: > > > That does not seem to make sense. Either you have > > 'none of this non-free crap in the archive ever' > > or you have > > 'the release team downgrades these bugs and includes non-free crap' > > > Not both. > > > Which is why they are on the same ballot. > > How does one vote, "I want the Release Team to have freedom to use > <suite>-ignore tags, plus I want to allow firmware in main independently > of what the Release Team thinks"? > > How does one vote, "I want the Release Team to have freedom to use > <suite>-ignore tags, plus I want Lenny not to be blocked by firmware > issues even if the Release teams changes their mind and remove the > lenny-ignore tags"? Or the vote that I suspect would be a reasonably common one if the vote allowed it: "I don't want firmware in main, but I want the Release Team to have the freedom to allow it for Lenny". Which was really the starting point of this whole round of proposals. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : sgran@debian.org | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature