[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: call for seconds: on firmware

On Sat, Nov 15 2008, Florian Weimer wrote:

> * Stephen Gran:
>> It's not possible to express the full set of relations in a single
>> winner vote, as far as I can tell.  It might be someone's vote to say
>> 'none of this non-free crap in the archive ever' and simultaneously
>> say 'but the release team does have the authority to downgrade these bug
>> reports if they need to'.  Unless I've missed something and we're
>> planning on having a multi winner vote, 
> We can always put the elements of the power set of all proposals on
> the ballot.

        Yes, people may propose and second combinations of current
 proposals, as long as they are not mutually exclusive.

> I suppose the ballot should be structured in a way that guarantees
> halfway meaningful outcomes, while not actively discriminating against
> certain proposals.  To be honest, I'm glad I need not decide such
> things.

        Being very hesitant about my wisdom, my first cutr at a ballot
 would be all the 6 proposals, plus a default, which is more or less
 proposal 1.

Flattery will get you everywhere.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>  
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: