Re: call for seconds: on firmware (was: on firmware (possible proposal))

To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: call for seconds: on firmware (was: on firmware (possible proposal))
From: "Paul Wise" <pabs@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 20:49:47 +0900
Message-id: <[🔎] e13a36b30811150349n424ff747ma9a51e625617a2e3@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20081115112422.GA7183@roeckx.be>
References: <[🔎] 20081112111410.GW5485@anguilla.noreply.org> <[🔎] 20081114201224.GA11008@intrepid.palfrader.org> <[🔎] 20081115112422.GA7183@roeckx.be>

On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> wrote:

> Does this mean that even if the blob is GPL'd, we don't need sources
> for it?

That sounds like it would be a GPL violation.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: call for seconds: on firmware
  - From: Luk Claes <luk@debian.org>

References:
- on firmware (possible proposal)
  - From: Peter Palfrader <weasel@debian.org>
- call for seconds: on firmware (was: on firmware (possible proposal))
  - From: Peter Palfrader <weasel@debian.org>
- Re: call for seconds: on firmware (was: on firmware (possible proposal))
  - From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>

Prev by Date: Re: on firmware (possible proposal)
Next by Date: Re: call for seconds: on firmware
Previous by thread: Re: call for seconds: on firmware (was: on firmware (possible proposal))
Next by thread: Re: call for seconds: on firmware
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread