Re: Discussion period: GR: DFSG violations in Lenny

[Adeodato Simó <dato@net.com.org.es>]

* Debian Project Secretary [Sun, 09 Nov 2008 13:23:03 -0600]:

> Hi,

Hello,

> ,----[ Proposal 2: allow Lenny to release with proprietary firmware ]
> | (Since this option overrides the SC, I believe it would require 3:1
> | majority)
> `----

> ,----[ Proposal 3: (allow Lenny to release with DFSG violations ]
> | (Since this option overrides the SC, I believe it would require 3:1
> | majority)
> `----

I don't think those lines were meant to be part of the ballot text, they
were just Robert's opinion. And, since the vote for Etch was 1:1, I
think these should be as well:

    http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_007

> ,----[ Proposal 4 ]
> |  (Since this option overrides the SC, I believe it would require 3:1
> |  majority)
> `----

In this case that sentence wasn't even included in the text by Andreas,
where did it come from?! Anyway, same reasoning as above applies.

Please amend.

-- 
Adeodato Simó                                     dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer                                  adeodato at debian.org
 
                         Listening to: Madeleine Peyroux - Careless love