[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Call for seconds: DFSG violations in Lenny



* Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (alexander@schmehl.info) [081103 19:00]:
> Hi!
> 
> Andreas Barth schrieb:
> > In case any of the proposals get enough seconds, I would propose then:
> > 
> > | Debian's priorities are our users and free software. We don't trade them
> > | against each other. However during getting an release out of the door,
> > | decisions need to be done how to get a rock stable release of the high
> > | quality Debian is known for, release more or less on time, and to
> > | minimize the usage of problematic software. We acknoledge that there
> > | is more than just one minefield our core developers and the release team
> > | are working at.
> > | 
> > | We as Developers at large continue to trust our release team to follow
> > | all these goals, and therefor encourage them to continue making
> > | case-by-case-decisions as they consider fit, and if necessary
> > | authorize these decisions.
> 
> Should you need to propose this, consider it seconded by me.
> 
> Should you do a s/acknoledge/acknowledge/ and/or s/therefor/therefore/
> I'll still second it.

I'm not considering this as an real amendment, but rather as a spelling
fix - but in case it needs accepting by me, consider it being accepted.


Cheers,
Andi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: