Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > I hereby propose those two alternate options and am asking for seconds. To be very blunt and direct: I think your a teensy, weeny bit late with this. We're currently already working on an alternate proposal. And that one has gotten a fairly big number of seconds. I really do not think that adding new proposals adds something to the issue under discussion. The main question is: does the project think DAM should be allowed to start implementing the proposal posted to d-d-a, or should the project as a whole decide on the future direction of the NM process and related processes. IMO that issue is addressed adequately in the open GR. Cheers, FJP
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.