On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 12:53 +0200, Benjamin BAYART wrote: > Le Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 09:50:37PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG: > > > > > Yes. So, the right solution if I want to help is: > > > - first I spend a lot of time proving that I'm skilled enough to read > > > crazy licenses in a language that is not mine > > > > No, you only have to do this if you want to package software and upload > > it into the archive without review. > > If you read back to the DM proposal, it is clearly stated that a DM is > not allowed to upload a NEW package. So, the approach is not wanting to > package&upload anything but a given package. That doesn't change the question about licensing. No DD can upload a NEW package without independent licensing review; but even an upgrade can involve license changes, and a DD must be competent to evaluate them. Thomas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part