Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 09:21:36PM +1300, Nick Phillips wrote:
> What it says, for those who can't (or can't be bothered) to read it is
> essentially this:
>
> We will include GFDL'd works that have no bad bits unless we have
> permission to remove them.
>
> Or rewritten slightly more clearly (by "bad bits" I obviously mean
> invariant sections, cover texts etc.):
>
> We will not include GFDL'd works that have no bad bits if we have
> permission to remove them.
Sorry, but the above two sentences mean something *completely*
different. Either you had a brain fart here, or your knowledge of the
English language is... strange.
--
Fun will now commence
-- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4
Reply to: