On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 09:48:24PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Andrew Suffield (asuffield@debian.org) [040728 20:25]: > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 07:00:29PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > > > =========================================================================== > > > The Debian project hereby resolves: > > > > > > - That the developers in charge for adding the architecture identified by > > > dpkg as "amd64", hereinafter "amd64", to the "unstable" archive, should > > > explain publicly (via debian-devel-announce@lists.debian.org) the problems > > > which delay this action. > > > This is a no-op by rule of the constitution. > > The developers may issue positions of the day (and this one could be > considered as one, as this doesn't try to force somebody to do work, > but to say: "we would like if this happens"). However, whether > publically telling somebody what exactly would he should do, would > really help to solve the problem, is something different. (Same is > true for all other issues in this GR-draft.) Yes, that's still a no-op. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature