On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 10:40:50AM +0200, Xavier Roche wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Philip Charles wrote: > > Admins are not the only people interested in 64-bit. > > Why not release r1 (r2, rx) when amd64 is ready? Whould it realy matter > > if there were minimal changes in the other archs provided that amd64 was > > released asap? > This is exactly what I was suggesting: > rx Type Release date > r0 Pure64-unstable asap > r1 Pure64-stable as soon as amd-pure64 fixed > r2 Multiarch as soon as march ready > r3+ * back to "regular" release cycles This suggestion does not belong on -vote. You would need to discuss this with the stable release manager instead (though I understand he's already given an answer of "no" to this). > Why not making an amendment in GR5 ? Because trying to force this kind of a technical decision via a GR is bullshit, unless you're going to follow with another GR that says "the Debian project resolves to fashion a new release team out of clay and authorizes the DPL to breathe life into them so that there will never be a shortage of qualified volunteers to fulfill our requests ever again". -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature