[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: -= PROPOSAL =- Release sarge with amd64



Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:

> * Goswin von Brederlow (brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de) wrote:
>> There is no and never will be a transition plan from i386 to
>> amd64. That is just not possible. You can't replace dpkg since then it
>> lacks its libc and you can't replace libc since then dpkg lacks the
>> old one. And so on for every other essential package.
>
> Eh, you might still be able to make it work.  I'm not convinced this
> will be all that much of a problem unless you try to do a full-blown
> move to one from the other, that might be difficult and complex.  If all
> you want to do is add the ability to run the other arch on top of
> whatever you've got, that might not be all *that* bad.

That would be multiarch.

Its possible without multiarch with special transitional debs but
building and maintaining them is wasted time better spend on
multiarch itself.

>> The only possible transition is from arch X to multiarch which is for
>> sarge+1 earliest.
>
> Well, maybe you already agree..  I'm talking about from blah to
> multiarch, of course.
>
> 	Stephen

Then we agree.

MfG
        Goswin



Reply to: