* Michael Banck (mbanck@debian.org) wrote: > On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 08:17:55AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > > * Raul Miller (moth@debian.org) wrote: > > > In other words, that the only thing we're talking about is distribution > > > of binaries built from sarge sources? > > > > Make it a release architecture which will move those bugs to RC and give > > us a BSP weekend. > > Did the amd64 team even ask the release team whether NMUing for amd64 > support is alright in case maintainers are inactive? I don't see why we > absolutely need to have amd64 on ftp.d.o in order to achieve this. I suppose not, but if it's not a release architecture I don't really see the justification for the NMU. It's possible (though pretty unlikely, but still) that such an NMU will break things or delay things more when people are working towards a release. If you really think it'd be worth asking them then I suppose we can, I don't really have any problem asking, just seems like an obvious answer to me, and other package maintainers are likely to feel the same way. Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature